breakinglight11: (Default)
This scene was Naomi Ibasitas’s suggestion. When we were filming Base Instruments this summer, we needed ensemble in Victorian eveningwear to fill out the ballroom scene, and Naomi offered to put on her Rosaline costume from Gentlemen Never Tell, and it sparked the idea that Rosaline was actually at the same ball, noticing Justin being his rakish self in that scene. There’s a moment where Clara exits with some other guests to chat, and Naomi suggested that it’s in that moment that Clara herself was the person who told Rosaline about Justin. I loved that idea; I think the two of them would get along. So here’s a very rough attempt at imagining how that little exchange would have happened.

Early meeting at a party


Day #5 - Sisters Against Strange Men )
breakinglight11: (Default)
October Review Challenge, #19 - "What’s a side character who turned out special?"

This is, without a doubt, Justin Hawking from the Mrs. Hawking series. He’s one of my favorite characters I’ve ever written. He is the charming, globetrotting elder brother of lead character Nathaniel Hawking, and designed to act as a foil to him. Where Nathaniel craves approval, Justin has turned not caring what people think of him into a lifestyle. Nathaniel is conventional, Justin is radical. Nathaniel is a mild-mannered monogamous father, while Justin is a bisexual libertine who’ll try anything once. It turned out I loved writing their interactions; I found giving them a push-pull between being there for one another and trying to get each other’s goat made for a very compelling relationship.

He’s just so charismatic and fun. He first appeared to needle everybody in part III: Base Instruments. I liked how he was sexy and fearless about it; again it made a nice contrast to the rest of the prudish and goody-goody cast. And I liked how he challenged them on their preconceptions, given his boldness in the face of social convention and his understanding of the artificiality and falseness of it. Still, we gave him a bit of extra dimension by revealing he’s sensitive to the fact that he’s the black sheep of his family, and Bernie suggested giving him a romantic history with Nathaniel’s wife Clara, to add an extra layer of complication.

I missed him since retiring Base Instruments from rep. He was played by Eric Cheung and Christian Krenek, each in their own way but both with a lot of charm. So, when Bernie and I wanted to go lighter and funny for our Hawking show this year, we decided it was finally time to bring him back— specifically in his own spinoff, the Wodehousian romantic comedy Gentlemen Never Tell. It allowed us to not only enjoy his fun and humorous qualities, it let us explore him a little bit more deeply. In this story, in addition to being funny, we let him confront his privilege as a wealthy libertine, and confront the fact that a lot of people see him as a user, as well as get to demonstrate his bisexuality in a meaningful way.

We’ll be putting that show up for the first time this fall. Christian plays Nathaniel these days, so Eric will be returning to bring him again to life. I’m really excited to be returning to him. I think it’s going to be a lot of fun.


Photo by John Benfield
breakinglight11: (Default)
October Review Challenge, #12 - "What is the most sympathetic villain you've ever written?"

This one I struggled with a bit. This was the second one suggested by my friend Jonathan, and I probably would not have considered adding it on my own.

Being the English teacher I am, I like to establish a definition for a concept before I use it. Antagonists are the figures in the story trying to prevent the protagonist from reaching their goals, but villainy I would characterize as when an antagonist has malicious intentions or is specifically supposed to be in the wrong. I frequently use non-villainous antagonists for the purpose of having conflict that’s not so cut and dried as somebody doing a good thing versus doing somebody a bad thing. It’s a great way to introduce shades of gray and complication.

However, I do love a good villain. Particularly when they’re genuinely wicked. To the point where if I want them sympathetic, I tend to keep them more toward the mere antagonist side, and if I let me them a real villain, they tend to be pretty nasty. So this makes it a little tricky to pick one who I genuinely want you to feel for.

There’s barely a villain to be had, with the exception of the intentionally broad General Hacksaw from part three, in any of the first four episodes of Dream Machine. Instead, most of the conflict there is interpersonal, between characters who are varying degrees of wrong but ultimately trying their best. Mrs. Hawking has a new villain almost every show, but most of them are supposed to be embodiments of various Victorian social ills— misogyny, class predation, systemic abuse or neglect —and so are rarely meant to be sympathized with. In Adonis, the majority of the characters are AWFUL, some to the point of being gross, to create a sense of the brutal world.

What I do frequently have is people who are responsible for some horrible act that was in some part driven by their circumstances. I frequently write about social ills, particularly ones that create negative environments that force people into terrible positions. So I do often make use of villains whose actions are not defensible, but who likely would not be forced into such desperate conditions if not for the unfairness around them. Without spoiling them, the solutions to at least two of my mysteries— Hawking IV: Base Instruments and The Tailor at Loring’s End —factors this in heavily. Even a character like Elizabeth Frost in the second Hawking trilogy, easily one of my wickedest, has to fight through the impossible position her class crushed her into, and the hugely unfair expectations placed on her as a too-young governess to a girl only five years her junior.



So of course I like making the conflict one that has more dimensions than just good-guy-versus-bad-guy. But no-villainy is a path I more often take than sympathetic-villainy.
breakinglight11: (Default)
October Review Challenge, #7 - "What's a humorous moment from your work?"

Thanks to the alphabetical order I put the prompts in, I ended up with Funny Line right before Humorous Moment. I wish they were separated by few more days. But they are distinct however, when one is about a one-liner that is funny, this is about something funny that happens.

As I've said, I've been very into humor these days. I've recently completed four episodes of my Dream Machine comedy since April, and I attribute that fairly large amount of work in such a short period to how fun and exciting I've found that project. I've been pretty proud of some of the amusing scenarios that made it into those scripts. Like in episode 2: "Requiem for a Dreamer" when Ryan is making Leah spitball ideas for a new show, and Cari did a series of costume changes in real time as her her character Josie has visualizes all their suggestions. Or in the soon-to-be-released episode 4: "The Opposite of People" when they have to audition a series of actors who are all... not quite what they're looking for.

I'm sure you are, but what's your name?


But I think I'm going to talk about another Hawking moment, since it was a neat unexpected touch in an otherwise serious piece. When we meet Justin Hawking in part III: Base Instruments, it's made clear quickly that he's a bit of a roguish ladies' man. When he and Nathaniel's first one-on-one scene begins, we hear Justin telling the end of what is clearly a raunchy story with the line, "And so I said to the second sister, 'I'm sure you are, but what's your name?'" Nathaniel is at once scandalized and intrigued, as he always is by his brother's exploits. But this actually isn't the moment I think is truly funny.

Later in the show, Nathaniel is trying to ingratiate himself with the kind of skeezy Lord Seacourse, who is a suspect in the murder they're investigating. But Nathaniel needs him to believe that he's also a creep like Seacourse is so the man will open up. So, in order to do that, what does he do? At the top of their scene together, Nathaniel tells the end of Justin's story in the exact same tone— "And so I said to the second sister, 'I'm sure you are, but what's your name?'" —as if it happened to him. And Seacourse cracks up. I love the idea that in order to appear like a skeeze, Nathaniel imitates the foremost skeeze in his life, his darling big brother. He loves Justin, but I think it's funny that he thinks Justin's life would appeal to a creep. It's a little mean and it's a little clever, which is honestly my favorite kind of humor.
breakinglight11: (Default)
October Review Challenge, #5 - "What theme shows up frequently in your work?"

By theme, I mean the ideas one deals with frequently in one's writing, the ideas that you like to ponder and explore. I am a very theme-focused writer— I couldn't even write a silly comedy without trying to say something with it —so naturally I have quite a few that I'm particularly interested in that show up frequently.

So I have plenty to choose from. Gender roles. Sexual objectification. The power of charisma. Learning to recognize and dismantle one's privilege. Claiming and reclaiming agency. The terrifying ordeal of being known. The pain and power of hope. Ego versus selflessness in attempting to do great things. I asked people once on Facebook what they thought my most persistent ones were, and these were among those that showed up in the responses.

But when I made this list I picked one at random to talk about, so I think today I'm going to discuss a very persistent one, fear of aging. While most writers tend to themes because they find them interesting, this is one is REAL personal for me, since it's basically my own biggest fear. I'm afraid of losing my looks, losing my physical capabilities. And I'm afraid of being forgotten about and dismissed, in our culture where unattractive and fragile old women are routinely pushed aside. I've always felt like a lot of people don't notice my inner qualities until they notice my outer ones, many of which fade with age, so it's something that haunts my thoughts.

As my most significant project, Mrs. Hawking naturally has a lot of examples of my style. But the lead character of Mrs. Hawking is profoundly afraid of aging in her own way. She's not concerned with her appearance like I am, but her work by which she determines her whole identity is dependent on her physical capability. She's forty years old when we meet her in 1880, and her society already considers her an old woman even though she's not. But by the time she gets injured in part III: Base Instruments, she's reminded of how her work will grind her down physically, and it will only get harder as she gets older. The idea terrifies her, because if she gets to the point where she can't be a society avenger, she doesn't know who'll she'll be. The second trilogy of Mrs. Hawking the issue really kicks in, and from here on out she's going to be forced to confront that her superhero life is finite. I believe you always should make your hero go through the thing that is hardest for them, and this is what Mrs. Hawking will have to deal with if she is truly to grow.

Change or Die


It's also an issue in my new comedy project, Dream Machine. The lead character Leah is a fairly extreme and ridiculous parody of myself, so naturally I've taken my little issue with aging and blown it out of proportion with her as well. Although weirdly with her, I've had her already decide she's a crone and is just focused on staying looking hot. I plan to have this frequently occur with her. But episode 3 in its entirety is about another character, the Robert Downey, Jr.-inspired second lead Ryan, dealing with the fact that he's aging. For him it's about figuring out how to change with the world around him, because, as the first rule of narrative states, the only alternative to change is death. That is frequently the challenge posed to a character afraid of aging— are they going to figure out how to change to survive and thrive as they're no longer armored with their youth as they once were?

Not all my themes are quite so personal as this one. But because it speaks to my own feelings, I think I have some thoughts about it that come from somewhere real.
breakinglight11: (Default)
This scene is another from Justin’s Wodehousian comedy adventure, meant to directly follower the opener #8 - “A Caper in Venice”, depicting Justin and his valet Peter Morgan arriving for the house party that will be the setting for the story.

This scene’s a little awkward. It’s got some clunky exposition and probably isn’t quite funny enough and needs punching up. But it’s intended to not only set the scene, but introduce you to what Justin and Morgan are like as people, and how they interact with each other. Justin is a whimsical, roguish free spirit who enjoys stirring up trouble and lives outside of convention. Morgan is his friend and loyal retainer, who attempts to be his voice of reason while he still supports him and backs him up, but is kind of his straight man and is noticeably more cautious. I also want to seed the problem dealt with in #10 - “On Your Terms” and #11 - “Need Someone”, where they care about each other, but the dynamic is not equal, and Justin is sometimes cavalier with that.

Also, notably, this show we will have the space to depict Justin as visibly bisexual. He always has been intended to be kind of a Kinsey 1 or 2, but in his previous appearance in Mrs. Hawking III: Base Instruments, it was tricky to make it present given his role in the story. Christian Krenek, the second person to portray him, had some good ideas to manifest it in small ways, but Justin would not be able to be terribly open with it in that company. While we want to make it part of his character and keep the story from getting too bogged down in the bigotry of the period, which would make the story a lot less fun, we also don’t like the idea of the characters reacting to it like modern people. So we’re trying to split the difference to have a little fun with it, without throwing the Victorian milieu out the window.


Photo by John Benfield


Day #14 - Man of Philosophy )
breakinglight11: (Default)
New photo gallery on Mrshawking.com!

Photography by Annushka Munch
Costume design by Jennifer Benfield
Makeup design by Jessicalee Skary
Set design by Bernie Gabin
Production design by Phoebe Roberts

Base Instruments 2018-56

Arisia 2018

Base Instruments - ACT I


Featuring Cari Keebaugh as Mrs. Hawking, Circe Rowan as Mary, Jeremiah O'Sullivan as Nathaniel, Matthew Kamm as Arthur, Sara Smith as Clara, Christian Krenek as Justin, Jackie Freyman as Miss Zakharova, Andrew Prentice as Lord Seacourse, Lucas Commons-Miller as Chernovsky, Jennifer Benfield as Miss Sherba, and Sara Dion and Travis Ellis as Ensemble.

Check out the gallery today!
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New blog entry on Mrshawking.com!

"How we built our prop victrola"



You may recall that when we were putting together Base Instruments for the first run at Arisia 2017, the challenge arose for us to somehow get the victrola prop that is a major presence in the story. While there are a number of record players on eBay and similar places that use the pressed vinyl disc, at this point in history the phonograph relied upon wax cylinders. It’s significantly harder to find even replicas of that older form of the technology. So we decided we would make one, and we'll be bringing it to our performances at the 2017 Watch City Steampunk Festival.

Read the rest of the entry on Mrshawking.com!

Vivat Regina and Base Instruments by Phoebe Roberts will be performed at 2PM and 6PM respectively at 274 Moody Street in Waltham, MA as part of the Watch City Steampunk Festival 2017.

breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New gallery on Mrshawking.com!

Photography by Annushka Munch
Costume design by Jennifer Giorno
Makeup design by Jessicalee Skary
Set design by Bernie Gabin
Production design by Phoebe Roberts

BI Performance-85

"Base Instruments" Act II
by Annushka Munch


from "Base Instruments" at Arisia 2017



Featuring Cari Keebaugh, Circe Rowan, Jeremiah O'Sullivan, Arielle Kaplan, Eric Cheung, Sara Smith, Matthew Kamm, and Ava Maag.

Click here to view the gallery of images from the show!

breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New gallery on Mrshawking.com!

"Gallery – Base Instruments at Arisia ’17 - Act One"

Photography by Annushka Munch
Costume design by Jennifer Giorno
Makeup design by Jessicalee Skary
Set design by Bernie Gabin
Production design by Phoebe Roberts

BI Performance-121

Arisia 2017

Base Instruments - ACT I



Featuring Cari Keebaugh, Circe Rowan, Jeremiah O'Sullivan, Arielle Kaplan, Matthew Kamm, Eric Cheung, Sara Smith, Andrew Prentice, Isaiah Max Plovnick, Ava Maag, Sara Dion, and Travis Ellis. Photography by Anna Muench with costume design by Jenn Day.

breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
We are proud to announce the video recording is now available for our performance of Base Instruments at Arisia 2017!

Base Instruments by Phoebe Roberts



Base Instruments from sydweinstein on Vimeo.



We are so happy to be able to present part 3 of the Mrs. Hawking series recorded for you to enjoy whenever you like. Thanks so much to Syd Weinstein and crew, who filmed this at Arisia 2017 and edited it together for us.

Please be sure to visit our Shows page for the video recordings of all three of the Mrs. Hawking so far, and see how all the hard work of all the great artists in our cast and crew come together to tell these amazing stories.

breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New post on Mrshawking.com!

"Performances at Arisia 2017 accomplished!"



At Arisia 2017 this past weekend, Mrs. Hawking brought its two most recent shows, part 2: Vivat Regina, and the world premiere of part 3: Base Instruments. And I am so delighted to report that the performances went great.



Read the rest of the entry on Mrshawking.com!
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
We are officially on the schedule at Arisia 2017!

you_doodle_2016-11-28t17_29_29z


The MRS HAWKING shows
By Phoebe Roberts

VIVAT REGINA
Friday, January 13th at 7:30PM

and

BASE INSTRUMENTS
Saturday, January 14th at 4PM
Sunday, January 15th at 12PM

In Grand Ballroom B

At the Westin Boston Waterfront
425 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

Please come join as at Arisia 2017 this January and come see our shows, including the debut performance of Base Instruments!

Vivat Regina and Base Instruments by Phoebe Roberts will be performed January 13th-15th at the Boston Westin Waterfront Hotel as part of Arisia 2017.
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New post on Mrshawking.com!

image


"Building a prop Victorian gramophone"

People who have experience in the field of properties for the stage may be familiar with a dilemma I’ve run into in producing the Mrs. Hawking plays. Sometimes, your script will call for a specific prop that expensive or difficult to acquire that is needed for only a scene or two, but is integral enough to the plot that it can’t be changed or cut. That means you’re stuck investing in getting or making the damn thing, even though it’s going to be a lot of effort for not a ton of use.

For Base Instruments, we’ve talked about the challenges of one specific setting. But the showpiece prop in that one will be the gramophone.

Read the rest of the entry on Mrshawking.com!
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New blog entry on Mrshawking.com!

"Challenges of staging Base Instruments

This fall we’re going to be going into rehearsals for Base Instruments, the third installment of the Hawking series. I’m extremely excited. Not only is Base Instruments the first true mystery of the series, in my opinion, each installment is better than the last, and so this most recent one is the best story yet. I can’t wait to bring that our audiences at Arisia 2017 next winter. But in moving on to this show, we’re definitely inviting new challenges in the staging process!

image


Read the rest of the entry on Mrshawking.com!
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)


Every year since 2012, I have participated in a playwriting challenge called 31 Plays in 31 Days, where you write a play of at least one page in length every day for the month of August. The focus is on encouraging generation, with as much rein to be creative and free of restriction as possible. In the past I've found it extremely useful, whether for simply generating new work, building up my portfolio of ten-minutes, or making progress on larger pieces I wanted to get drafted.

August is right around the corner, so I find myself with the option of putting myself to the test again. But I'm wondering if it's the best use of my time. Right now it's not terribly useful to me to just be writing random new scenes-- I have enough projects already planned on I'd rather be devoting my time and energy to. The obvious move in that case is to use 31P31D to force myself to make progress on one of those projects. That's basically what I did last year, when I mostly focused on getting a complete draft of Base Instruments, and it proved to be very effective.

Last year, however, I'd spent the previous several months plotting Base Instruments out and making an outline of the events. I believe structure is very important and my work tends to involve a lot of plotting, so figuring out the shape of events beforehand is really necessary to my process. Right now I don't have that prepared for anything I want to work on right now. Well, except for my Robin Hood-inspired heist show pilot. But I'm two-thirds of the way done with that right now, and I'm aiming to have it completely finished by the 8th, so it wouldn't provide me with much to work on for the month.

The other thing I'd be thinking of working on this year is the fourth Mrs. Hawking play. But as I said, I haven't been able to do all the extensive plot structuring and outlining I really like to do before I actually draft. I don't know if I'd be ready to actually write many scenes for it by August. Plus that piece is going to involve a lot of historical research beforehand anyway, which I definitely have not had a chance to do. So I don't know if I can manage that.

The other alternative is to change the nature of the challenge. I could decide to hold myself to a different standard, such as doing X amount of writing-involved work for a piece for each day of August. I've been reluctant to do that, as I said when I was pondering this last year around this time, because it's harder to measure and quantify, and it's very difficult to display results of any kind. I kind of like having a little thing I wrote to post every day.

I'm not sure. I really do like doing the challenge, as it's been useful for me every year so far. I'd love to experience that kind of productivity boost again, but the circumstances may just not be right for it this time. Maybe I'll do it anyway because it makes me feel good, or maybe I'll decide it will take too much time and effort away from more productive writing work. Haven't decided yet.
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
New post on Mrshawking.com!"

"Recording of Base Instruments staged reading"

Were you hoping to catch the Bare Bones staged reading of Mrs. Hawking part three, Base Instruments, but couldn't make the performance date? Well, turns out you are in luck, because we were able to capture the reading for your listening pleasure!

image


The following two files on the Mrs. Hawking YouTube channel have recording of the audio of the Base Instruments reading. Act one is in the first recording and act two is in the second. The quality is not perfect, as they were recorded on the fly during the reading, but they do a good job capturing the performances and the reactions of the audience.





What I particularly enjoy about these is they preserve the natural responses of the listeners in the moment. I really enjoy noting what lines got laughs-- Eric Cheung as Justin Hawking had scenes where it was almost a one-to-one laugh-to-line ratio! And I really got a kick out of the charmed reaction they had to the scene between Mary and Arthur. It even draws my attention to where there WASN'T the response I was expecting, so I know where to examine more closely for editing. And of course it captures the awesome performances of the actors. I was really lucky to work with such a talented cast, many of whom were switching not just between characters, but also accents!

So if you missed the Bare Bones reading, please give these a listen. It's a great way to take in the story of Base Instruments, performed by talented people with live audience feedback, just the way a show like that is intended.
breakinglight11: (CT photoshoot 1)
"What I learned from the Bare Bones reading of Base Instruments"

image
Photos by Beckie Hunter


I was really pleased and proud of how well the staged reading of Base Instruments went this past Friday. The cast did an amazing job, and the audience was great, laughing at all the right parts and having some really interesting feedback in the discussion we held after.

image


A major reason to have a staged reading is to hear the words of a play aloud, as they were intended to be heard, in front of a real audience. This enables you to experience the play in a way you can’t just looking at the page alone. It’s even better when you can talk a little with the audience and get a sense of how they actually experienced it.

Read the rest of the entry on Mrshawking.com!

Profile

breakinglight11: (Default)
breakinglight11

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 09:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios